Sunday, August 29, 2004

Iran-Contra II?

That's the title of a must-read Washington Monthly investigative report by Joshua Micah Marshall, Laura Rozen, and Paul Glastris, about the still-unfolding neocon spy scandal at the Department of Defense. Looks like a secret Bush Administration program to launch the US into war with Iran has been busted.

Saturday, August 28, 2004

spy in neoconservadroids' lair?

Middle East expert, Juan Cole discusses the unfolding spy scandal, while Jim Lobe details the neocons in Feith's fief.

why neoconservadroids act that way & what to do about it at the RNC

In one of the most affluent nations in the world, how can we explain the persistence of the ignorance, avarice, and hatred of life epitomized by the Bush Administration and its supporters? How can humans continue in behavior which overwhelming evidence shows is maddening, brutalizing, and ultimately self-destructive?  Are human beings naturally greedy and stupid, or are they conditioned that way?

The pioneering research of Wilhelm Reich suggests that the answers to these questions lie in the unnatural, life-negating ethos of our mechanized civilization, where knowledge has become game-show trivia, love a consumer commodity, and work an unconscious automatism. 

....Although sexual orgasm is the most dramatic discharge of biological energy, music, dance, poetry, healthy athletics, and pleasurable work have similar life-affirmative effects on the human organism.  In all of these, we surrender to the rhythms of the body’s inspiration and respiration, the pulse of the heartbeat and blood, and shed the fearful egocentric grasping characteristic of capitalist culture, finding connection to our fellow humans and the cosmos.  To the right is a diagram depicting the arc of the sexual act in orgastically potent men and women.

However, in many individuals—indeed, too many – the heavy character-armoring encouraged by repressive, parasitic social relations serves to inhibit the natural flow of Orgone  bio-energy, and often the only way these people can experience pleasure is through militarism, sado-masochism, greed, and cruelty.  Typically, these individuals have stiff, spastic facial expressions and are unable to move their pelvises except in a constrained, robotic manner.  The BOP Collective has obtained revealing data on the frustrated orgasm arcs of a number of such people in the Bush Administration, shown below:

Not only does the bound energy of the incrusted emotions produce fascist anal hysteria, but also carcinogenic molecular free radicals, also shown.  The heavily armored individual is not only a menace to society, but to himself.  Because of this bioenergetic distortion, a palpable aura of rage and hatred emanates from these pathological people – this can be identified as Deadly Orgone Energy (DOR).  In large groups, such as the Republican National Convention, the great quantity of DOR produced can have a crippling, evil effect for miles around. 
...from: Brooklyn Orgastic Politics Collective (BOP-C), a group with big plans:
On Thursday, September 2nd, for several hours prior to and during George Bush’s re-nomination ceremony, the Brooklyn Orgastic Politics Collective (BOP-C) will be conducting Orgone operations with several of our Cloudbusters, attempting to suck the fascism from the Republican National Convention at Madison Square Garden.  From an undisclosed location on the Brooklyn waterfront, we will be redirecting the flow of Life Energy above the deadly concentrations of hatred and greed accumulating in midtown Manhattan.  If indeed our theories prove correct, it may be possible to reduce the entire convention floor to a quivering Saturnalia.   The moans of Love shall ring out across the Land!

Friday, August 27, 2004

"they remain determined"

....despite setbacks, all the key neocons in the administration retain their posts, and they remain determined to realize their bold world-changing agenda. While many predict their imminent demise, and while I would very much like to believe them, I agree with Sieff that the neocons are fiercely determined, have great staying power, and remain highly dangerous to the world---most immediately, to Iran and Syria.
...from: Neocon Musings

Thursday, August 26, 2004

an odd breed





They are an odd breed, these men. They hate dictatorship, unless they're doing the dictating.
...from: Beware the Vulcans: Why this US Vote is so Critical by Lawrence Martin


 

Wednesday, August 25, 2004

neoconservadroids down but not out

...says Justin Raimondo, in The Neocon Civil War .

Tuesday, August 24, 2004

neoconservadroids send in the ghouls

American troops search coffins as a matter of routine at holy city's sprawling cemetery:

"Hurry up," he urged the Salmans. "The other day the Americans fired at a funeral group."

....Near the graveyard entrance soldiers had stopped a Toyota van with another coffin tied to the roof. Specialist Brian Phillips, 21, was ordered to open the lid.

"Oh my Jesus Christ," he exclaimed. "He's got a f****** bullet hole right through his face. It's disgusting."

He jumped down from the van and vomited in a clump of bushes.

The mother of the dead man began wailing and shouting.

"Hey," Staff Sgt Brandon George shouted. "Grandma over there is freaking out. Calm her down." He explained: "The problem is that we've found some coffins with weapons in them."

He ordered his translator to ask if any of the relatives were members of the Mahdi army. Digital photographs were taken of the body.

Some in the funeral party said the man had been killed in a family feud; others claimed he had been shot by an American helicopter. With strong suspicions that he had been a Mahdi fighter, the relatives were told to stay put for further questioning.

Monday, August 23, 2004

how scary are the neoconservadroids?

Even right-winger Pat Buchanan is issuing another warning:
Enter the "cakewalk" neoconservatives. Though disastrously wrong about Iraq's receptivity to U.S.-imposed democracy, and though they face disgrace and oblivion if Bush loses, they have one last card to play: That is to have America widen her wars with Afghanistan and Iraq with a preemptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. For the neoconservatives, Iraq was simply Phase II of "World War IV" for imperial domination of the Middle East and serial destruction of the regimes in Iraq, Syria, Iran and Saudi Arabia, as well as of Hezbollah, Hamas and the Palestinian Authority. The neocons have not abandoned this imperial project. Nor has Bush removed a single one from power, though they may yet cost him his presidency. And the neoconservative commentariat is again beating the drums for war – this time on Iran. This is their hole card. If they can ignite a new war, the country may forget how they bungled the old war. In escalation lies vindication.
...read it all: Neocons Seek Vindication in Escalation, published today at Antiwar.com.

Sunday, August 22, 2004

cowardly Bush & neocon clique pursue absurd Iraq slaughter

"AC-130s fired their cannons at Mahdi Army positions in the sacred Valley of Peace cemetery near the holy shrine of Ali,"Juan Cole reports.

Somebody please remind me why the US is there in the first place.
Something about removing a dictator who slaughtered his own people, last I heard.
Now Bush has taken his place.

Friday, August 20, 2004

Rummy's back

"The nation's top dog of war is frisky again," reports Normon Solomon, who observes, "When Rumsfeld comes in for harsh media criticism, he takes a licking and keeps on ticking ... like a time bomb."

Wednesday, August 18, 2004

NYC to GOP: Drop Dead

That's the headline of Ted Rall's latest column, expressing a deep disgust that sounds and feels real. Down with the Neoconservadroid Ruling Elite!

Tuesday, August 17, 2004

no good deed goes unpunished

Soon we'll be seeing the neoconservative funded group called "Pussies in Boots for Truth" calling PFC Hammer a liar and swearing that they personally witnessed the distinguished feline smuggling cheese to terrorist rats and smoking catnip from a bong.
...read it all and check out the great photo: Cat Sees More Battle than President Gomer

calling out the cowardly, or at least hypocritical, expletive-deleted, flip-flopping neoconservadroid veep


Says CNN:
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) -- Vice President Dick Cheney's questioning of John Kerry's war record and his ability to protect America is "cowardly," Sen. Tom Harkin said Monday.

"It just outrages me that someone who got five deferments during Vietnam and said he had 'other priorities' at that time would say that," said the Iowa Democrat, a former Navy fighter pilot.He accused President Bush and his vice president of "resorting to dirty attacks on John Kerry's war record."

"They're running scared because John Kerry has a war record and they don't," said Harkin. "What he (Cheney) is doing and what he is saying is cowardly. The actions are cowardly.

...Harkin said that it angered him to hear tough talk from Cheney.

"When I hear this coming from Dick Cheney, who was a coward, who would not serve during the Vietnam War, it makes my blood boil," said Harkin.

"He'll be tough, but he'll be tough with someone else's kid's blood," said Harkin....
Juan Cole calls Cheney's attacks hypocritical if not cowardly, accuses him of "arrogant, unilateral war-mongering," and gives him a history lesson on how "sensitivity" has in fact helped the US win wars in the past, while The Daily Howler catches Cheney in an embarrassing "sensitivity" flip-flop.

Monday, August 16, 2004

The Rightwing Roots of Bush's Foreign Policy

That's the title of a History News Network essay worth reading by San Francisco State University historian, Jules Tygiel, who observes:
Polls show that Americans have grown increasingly disillusioned with President George W. Bush’s invasion of Iraq. Most people view this as a product of the Bush administration’s hubris or mistakes rather than a failure of its ideology. Yet what is particularly striking is how much the problems in Iraq stem from longstanding conservative and neoconservative policies and strategies. Pre-emptive war, unilateralism, a disregard for international treaties, contorted legal interpretations, and the manipulation of intelligence reports, have characterized not merely President Bush’s efforts, but more than a half century of conservative thinking and leadership.

Sunday, August 15, 2004

more re the neconservadroid divide

Fukuyama, throughout his article, argues with Krauthammmer over both the ideological substance of neoconservatism as well as the implementation of neoconservative vision. Fukuyama argues that legitimacy of American values and institutions is not automatic in the eyes of those around the world -- and a certain degree of realism requires us to acknowledge that since India thinks that a UN resolution is the only thing that can make a war legitimate, then we need to respect that reality if we want a nation like India's support. There were some in the room during the dinner who thought that Frank Fukuyama's remarks didn't really define true neoconservatism because he didn't acknowledge the universalism of American ideals and institutions and acknowledged that America's predominant power would breed rival balances of power in the future -- which these observers feel doesn't hang with pure neoconservatism.

I'm convinced that Fukuyama is a major stakeholder in neoconservative circles -- mostly because he thinks he is and makes a claim to some degree of ideological stewardship of this movement. But it's clear that Krauthammer and he disagree strongly on ideology and on its practice in Iraq. I have been informed by the editor of National Interest that Charles Krauthammer will have a counter-point article in the next issue of the journal.
...continues at The Washington Note


Friday, August 13, 2004

the neocon road to Najaf

The road to Najaf began in the early months after it became fairly obvious that there was going to be a bit more to this than merely cakewalking into Baghdad and turning the economy over to Halliburton while democracy spread throughout the Middle East.

Actually, the road began with the sacking of our first occupation administrator, Lt. Gen. Jay Garner.

Garner’s offense was that he clashed with the cabal of Neoconservatives within the administration.  There were probably several issues but we now know that two of the big ones had to do with elections and economics.

Specifically, Garner advocated early elections and opposed the Polish-style economic shock treatment of cramming down market capitalism too soon and without input of the Iraqi’s themselves.  Yes, the Iraqis would make mistakes but they would own their country and much more important than immediately changing the economic system was providing employment even if by inefficient bureaucracies and state owned industries.
...continues at The Washington Dispatch

results of the neocon regime

Kurt Vonnegut lists some of the worst:
In case you haven’t noticed, and as a result of a shamelessly rigged election in Florida, in which thousands of African Americans were arbitrarily disenfranchised, we now present ourselves to the rest of the world as proud, grinning, jut-jawed, pitiless war lovers, with appallingly powerful weaponry and unopposed.

In case you haven’t noticed, we are now almost as feared and hated all over the world as the Nazis were.

With good reason.

In case you haven’t noticed, our unelected leaders have dehumanized millions and millions of human beings simply because of their religion and race. We wound and kill ’em and torture ’em and imprison ’em all we want.

Piece of cake.

In case you haven’t noticed, we also dehumanize our own soldiers, not because of their religion or race, but because of their low social class.

Send ’em anywhere. Make ’em do anything.

Piece of cake.

Tuesday, August 10, 2004

today's headline that best illustrates the futility of neocon Iraq policy

Helicopters Pound Najaf Cemetery

Monday, August 09, 2004

Iraq war tout stands to profit handsomely

Steve Clemons' new blog, The Washington Note, details how, ex-CIA Director James Woolsey, reportedly first to proclaim a connection between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda post-9/11, stands to reap war profits. Clemons is also using the blog's comment feature to engage readers in an ongoing dialogue -here's hoping he can keep that up and not drown in the flood of abusive spam that has led other bloggers to turn off the commenting feature.

neoconservadroids' Iraqi darling faces new charges

The Los Angeles Times calls Ahmad Chalabi down but not out, still enjoying support among his American champions, and " to amass power and wealth in the new Iraq."

Sunday, August 08, 2004

nearsighted neoconservadroid

Talking Points Memo analyzes neoconservadroid strategist Douglas Feith's lame self-justification in yesterday's New York Times, calling it "one of the clearest pieces of evidence for the strategic myopia at the heart of the Bush administration's 'war on terror'."

Saturday, August 07, 2004

Iraq fiasco turns belligerently-surnamed neoconservadroid against Team Bush

Francis Fukuyama used to be part of the Washington gang that happily filled in the gaps in George Bush's intellectual world. Several of his fellow members - Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz - have played defining roles in the Bush presidency and will effectively meet their political fate with him in November.

Fukuyama, however, has departed from Team Bush over Iraq. Despite his ranking as one of the world's foremost public intellectuals and a leading neoconservative thinker, he will not be voting Republican this year and he thinks his old ally, Rumsfeld, should have resigned over Iraq.

"There seems to be this cultural thing that Americans don't resign, no matter what," he says. "But I think that people who are responsible for policy that hasn't gone well owe it to give a chance to somebody else. I just think they [the Bush Administration] ought to be held accountable for policy failure."

...read it all in the Sydney Morning Herald: Under friendly fire

Friday, August 06, 2004

it depends on what the meaning of is is

To the degree that neoconservatism has any real meaning‚ ironically, it is now a discussion about its role in foreign policy, where it reflects the view of that wing of the Republican Party that is idealistic about the ability of American power to remake the world. In that sense the neocon influence is greatly exaggerated.
That's New Republic editor Peter Beinart fuzzing it up in an interview published today.

they never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop
thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do
we."
-George W. Bush, 5 August 2004


Thursday, August 05, 2004

will robots replace neoconservadroids?

Robot guard will smoke out villains reports New Scientist. Neoconservadroids begin foaming at the mouth.

the mystery of the missing neoconservadroid

With War Losing Support, Rumsfeld Stages a Retreat, in today's Los Angeles Times.

demystifying the neoconservadroids: a view from the right

Powered by both Jewish and non-Jewish neoconservatives centered in the offices of Pentagon Chief Donald Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney and by White House deference to the solidly pro-Zionist Christian Right, the neoconservative worldview – dedicated to the security of Israel and the primacy of military power in a world of good and evil – emerged after 9/11 as the driving force in the foreign policy of current President George W Bush, as well as the dominant narrative in a cowed and complacent mass media.

...according to Halper and Clarke, "the neoconservative vision is one of fear cantered around (Thomas) Hobbes' doomsday vision of man in his primitive state" and "extreme pessimism" reflected in the political philosophy of Leo Strauss, whose thought exercised a strong influence on the neoconservative movement through its godfather Irving Kristol and assorted disciples, some of whom have risen to prominence within and around the Bush administration, particularly in the national-security arena.

Indeed, the authors join a number of other critics, particularly on the right, in rejecting the notion that neoconservatives can really be considered "conservative" at all. Not only are they reckless in favoring the use of military power, but their advocacy of "nation-building" or "transforming the Middle East" belies an arrogance that is entirely foreign to the core conservative conviction that free or democratic societies are the product of centuries of organic development, the basis for which can neither be imposed from outside nor built overnight.

Similarly, and consistent with their view of the world as a moral battleground, neoconservatives pay little attention to such notions as "stability" and "normalcy," or even, the "economic implications of their policies." This should be of particular concern to U.S. corporations, a traditional conservative political constituency, the authors argue, because the "U.S. business world – multi-polar, multilateral, cooperative, interdependent, consumer-driven and rule-based ... is as different from the neoconservative world as night from day."


...from: Attacking Neo-Cons From the Right by Jim Lobe, a review of America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order by Stefan Halper, a U.S. policy-maker under past Republican administrations who teaches at Cambridge, and Jonathan Clarke, a retired British diplomat currently based at the Cato Institute

Wednesday, August 04, 2004

"just do it, we can always lie about it later"

David Sirota and Christy Harvey demonstrate definitvely that Bush and his neoconservadroid crew took us to war in Iraq knowing that they were lying about the reasons.
If desperation is ugly, then Washington, D.C. today is downright hideous.

As the 9/11 Commission recently reported, there was “no credible evidence” of a collaborative relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda. Similarly, no weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq. With U.S. casualties mounting in an election year, the White House is grasping at straws to avoid being held accountable for its dishonesty.

The whitewash already has started: In July, Republicans on the Senate Intelligence Committee released a controversial report blaming the CIA for the mess. The panel conveniently refuses to evaluate what the White House did with the information it was given or how the White House set up its own special team of Pentagon political appointees (called the Office of Special Plans) to circumvent well-established intelligence channels. And Vice President Dick Cheney continues to say without a shred of proof that there is “overwhelming evidence” justifying the administration’s pre-war charges.

But as author Flannery O’Conner noted, “Truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.” That means no matter how much defensive spin spews from the White House, the Bush administration cannot escape the documented fact that it was clearly warned before the war that its rationale for invading Iraq was weak.

Top administration officials repeatedly ignored warnings that their assertions about Iraq’s supposed Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and connections to al Qaeda were overstated. In some cases, they were told their claims were wholly without merit, yet they went ahead and made them anyway. Even the Senate report admits that the White House “misrepresented” classified intelligence by eliminating references to contradictory assertions.

In short, they knew they were misleading America.

And they did not care.
Read it and weep.

Tuesday, August 03, 2004

neocon sofa samurais

As for national security, one's stomach churns hearing President Bush, VP Dick Cheney, and neocon sofa samurais, many of whom dodged active military service during the Vietnam War, shamelessly accusing Kerry, who won three Purple Hearts in combat, of being soft on defence.

writes Eric Margolis in Bush like Custer

worth repeating how others see US

In many parts of the Muslim world the war against global terrorism has come to be viewed as a war against Islam and Muslims. The image of America has become that of a neo-imperial power that has sought to redraw the map of the Middle East and the Muslim world, influenced by an unholy alliance of neoconservatives and the militant Christian right, in an attempt to implement a New American century.

...from: History lessons, in The New Nation, "Bangladesh's independent news source"

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?